FRA emboldens tribals in Dudhwa to demand control over grass
THE past two rainy seasons 65-year-old Ramdas Rana has spent much of his sleeping hours adjusting his bed to an elusive dry patch. The thatched roof of his hut has been leaking since 2008. He could not repair it because the grass used for thatching is out of bounds for him.
Rana and other tribals of the Tharu community in Surma village in Dudhwa National Park used grass collected from the forests to make and rep air their huts every year. Three years ago the forest department stopped them from collecting it. This despite the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, that recognises rights of the forest dwellers over minor forest produce. The department instead burnt the grass.
The residents of the villages have now become aw are of their rights. On January 15, the village forest rights committees of Surma and other 36 villages served a notice to the park administration. They warned of legal action under FRA if they were denied entry for collecting forest produce. The committees are formed under the Act to recommend grant of titles for the rights claimed by the forest dwelling individuals and communities.
The committees, in their notice, informed the administration that the residents would enter en masse on January 20 and collect the grass. The district administration called a meeting of the forest and tribal welfare department officials and the committee members on January 27. The authorities were asked to allow the tribals to take the produce till the process of disposing of the claims under FRA is not complete. “I have started repairing the roof,” said Rana.
The victory for Rana and others has come after a long struggle. Thirty-seven out of the total 39 villages from the park were relocated when Dudhwa was notified in 1977. They were later converted to revenue villages in 1986. The tribals of Surma and Golbhoji village did not accept the relocation. They kept fighting for their traditional rights. In 2003, the Allahabad High Court ordered relocation of these villages. But it could not be done as alternative land was unavailable. It was only after FRA was enacted in 2007, the relocation was put on hold and the process of the recognition of rights started.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.