Even as Japan submitted to the World Trade Organization (wto) a proposal to impose tariffs of about 30 per cent on us steel in retaliation for duties on steel imports the us introduced (it has now taken this proposal back) the Geneva-based trade body ruled on November 25, 2003 that Japan's quarantine restrictions on us apple imports lack scientific justification. The us had brought the case last May in response to restrictions Japan has imposed on the apple imports to prevent fire blight, a plant disease. An appellate panel upheld a July, 2003 decision of wto arbitrators that Japan had violated international rules.
While Japan's 'victory' over the us on steel duties may have soured a trifle, the ruling has implications for Australia, which uses the same argument as Japan to block apple imports from New Zealand.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
.png)
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.