Africa had several tense moments before it could get the desertification convention through
IF THERE was one thing that African leaders wanted out of Rio, it was a convention on desertification. And finally they got it. The 47th general assembly has now been asked to set up an intergovernmental negotiating committee for the convention.
The jubilant Africans, however, had numerous tense moments with the United States and the European Community (EC) changing positions on the issue of a desertification convention. At one point, James Nadjie of Ghana had resigned himself to the fact that "we have nothing to take back home".
The proposed convention became controversial when the US backed out from its earlier promises. At the last prepcom, the idea got bracketed because nobody could agree over the selection of the implementing agency which should service the preparation of the convention. Several Africans wanted this to be entrusted to the United Nations' Sudano-Sahelian Office (UNSO). But others, favouring the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), had raised objections.
By the time the African countries gathered in Rio, the matter had been complicated by the US which tried to get their support for a forest convention by holding the desertification convention as a carrot. The EC, led by the UK, joined hands in opposing the desertification convention on the grounds that "it was not sufficiently thought through". The US was also afraid of expanding new areas under the Global Environmental Facility (GEF) and the financial implications that the convention would have. The US proposed dropping of all references to the convention. Disappointment among the African nations was so great that Nadjie reacted, saying, "We want the Agenda 21 to be reborn under a new leadership".
The G-77 had anticipated a possible attempt by the North to link the desertification and forest conventions. In fact, the communique of the Kuala Lumpur meeting of G-77 ministers in April had ignored the issue of desertification to avoid this possible linkage, which had alienated a large number of African states. It was speculated that if the US linked the two conventions, the Africans would break ranks with the G-77 on the forest convention.
But in Rio, a rift also appeared between the desert states and forest states of Africa. Will a heavily forested country like Gabon trade a forest convention for a desertification convention? "We are for African solidarity on the desertification issue. But the interest of Gabon will always take precedence," said Juste Boussienguet, Gabon's minister of environment. Jacques Baudin, minister of environment in Senegal, was noncommittal: "Senegal is the first victim of desertification and desperately needs a desertification convention. We have nothing against the forest principles".
But before the rift could widen, the US and EC agreed to an international convention on desertification.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.