Book>>An appetite for wonder, the making of a scientist • Eco Books • Rs 1,930
Richard Dawkins usually arouses extreme reactions. He is a demigod for many rationalists, atheists and evolutionists. His theories have attracted the ire of creationists. Marxists and socialists argue his brand of abrasive rationalism is blinkered to social nuances. Post-colonialists chastise the scientist for paying short shrift to cultural diversity and social scientists find it difficult to accept his theory of genes determining human behaviour. Some of Dawkins’ fellow evolutionists have found faults in his theories.
But most critics laud him for his clear prose and for the lucidity he brings to complicated aspects of evolutionary science. Like him or hate him, it is difficult to ignore Richard Dawkins. His memoir, therefore, is a potential bestseller. A caveat however—An Appetite for Wonder, The Making of a Scientist is about Dawkins’ early years. Those looking for the controversial Dawkins will be disappointed. But An Appetite for Wonder has a lot on the influences that shaped Dawkin’s intellectual development.
A large part of Dawkins’ childhood was spent in Africa in early 1940s. His parents were enthusiastic naturalists. His extended family included a cousin who wrote about the birds of Burma and Borneo. Other relatives held the post of chief conservator of forests in India and Nepal.
Dawkins recalls that his father’s bedtime stories often featured a Broncosaurus, which said “‘tiddly-widdly-widdly’ in a high falsetto.” His mother Jean kept diaries. Dawkins quotes an entry, which describes the young Richard’s love for Africa. “When we got to England (Richard) was quite a sad little boy, and had lost all his bounce. While we were looking out of the ship at Liverpool docks in the dark rain...he asked…When are we going back (to Africa)?"
There are also passages where Dawkins thinks he should have made better use of his critical faculties as a child. He laments his readiness to believe that a pet goes to pet heaven upon death.
There are times when the evangelist of rationalism takes over from the gentle nature lover. At another point in his memoir Dawkins asks, “Why do adults foster the credulity of children? Is it really so obviously wrong, when a child believes in Father Christmas, to lead her in a gentle little game of questioning? How many chimneys would he have to reach, if he is to deliver presents to all the children in the world? How fast would his reindeer have to fly in order that he should finish the task by Christmas morning? Don’t tell her point blank that there is no Father Christmas. Just encourage her in the unfaultable habit of skeptical questioning.”
His parents returned to England when Dawkins was not yet a teenager. England was a terrible contrast to Africa. Dawkins was pushed into an educational system where bullying and sadistic punishment were part of the course. The budding atheist balked at having to recite prayers in a “parrot fashion”. Stifled by a system that discouraged critical thinking, Dawkins found solace in observing nature. The scientist, however, thinks his observation powers are nothing to write home about.
He came into his own as a biologist once he enrolled at Oxford University. When asked to write a paper on the vascular systems of starfish (which do not have blood, but have a system of vessels to pump seawater), Dawkins “dreamed starfish hydraulics. Tube feet marched behind my eyelids, hydraulic pedicellariae quested and sea water pulsed through my dozing brain.”
The memoirs stop at 1976 with the publication of Dawkins’ critically acclaimed The Selfish Gene. The second installment of Dawkins’ memoirs is promised in 2015. This reviewer is looking forward to it.
Urmila Singh is a historian
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.