Mining

Centre proposes more power for states to grant environmental clearance

The draft notification, which is in public domain, now puts more mining projects under the ambit of State Environmental Impact Assessment Authorities

 
By Ikshaku Bezbaroa
Last Updated: Wednesday 27 December 2017 | 12:22:40 PM
Until now, the EIA notification of 2006 required the Centre to clear all non-coal mining projects which needed 50 or more hectares of land. Credit: Sunita Narain / CSE
Until now, the EIA notification of 2006 required the Centre to clear all non-coal mining projects which needed 50 or more hectares of land. Credit: Sunita Narain / CSE Until now, the EIA notification of 2006 required the Centre to clear all non-coal mining projects which needed 50 or more hectares of land. Credit: Sunita Narain / CSE

On December 18, 2017, the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) issued a draft notification to amend the Environment Impact Assessment Notification (2006) and subsequent amending notifications such as those issued in 2014 and 2016. The latest amendment increases the ambit of state government authorities to grant environmental clearances (ECs) to development projects. The draft notification particularly relates to mining projects involving non-coal minerals and minor minerals, as well as river valley/irrigation projects.

The draft notification, which is in public domain, now puts more mining projects under the ambit of State Environmental Impact Assessment Authorities (SEIAAs) and State Expert Appraisal Committees (SEACs), for clearance. Concerned parties are allowed to comment on the notification before it is finalised within a period of 60 days from its date of issue.

Changes proposed for mining projects

The Central government can now clear only those non-coal mining projects requiring 100 or more hectares of land lease. Until now, the EIA notification of 2006 (and subsequent amendments) required the Centre to clear all such projects which required 50 or more hectares of land.

For minor minerals, including sand mining, both for individual and cluster projects, the ones requiring more than 25 but less than 100 hectares of land, fall in B1 category (requiring state clearances), while those above 100 hectares fall in A category (requiring central clearances).

Proposals regarding lease areas of less than five hectares, however, remain under district authorities such as District Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (DEIAA) and District Expert Appraisal Committee (DEAC), as per the 2016 amendment.

The requirements for coal mining projects also remain unchanged.

Changes proposed for river valley and irrigation projects

River valley and irrigation projects, involving cultural command area (CCA) of 2,000-10,000 hectares, were initially to be cleared by state agencies whereas those involving more than 10,000 hectares were to be cleared by the Centre. The new notification, however, expands this range of projects vastly by allowing states to clear projects involving CCA between 5,000 to 50,000 hectares. Projects involving CCA of less than 5,000 hectares would be classified under ‘minor irrigation projects’.

Besides enhancing the jurisdiction of state agencies to clear projects, changes have been introduced regarding certain special circumstances. With respect to river valley and irrigation projects, further changes have been introduced. For those river valley projects falling in more than one state, the Central government would be the appraising authority. Moreover, project proposals, involving changes in irrigation technology (which have environmental benefits) by existing projects leading to an increase in CCA but no increase in dam height or submergence, will no longer require ECs.

The purported changes are part of a series of notifications which have, over the years, steadily increased the responsibility of states to clear more and more projects by reducing the burden on the Centre. However, while the intention may be to encourage states to deliberate on clearances, capacity and accountability issues remain a problem. The problems are especially with respect to state-level clearance authorities, the SEIAAs and SEACs. These agencies neither have the capacity to handle increased work load, nor is there a system of accountability in place to ensure some transparency in how clearances are issued.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Related Story:

MoEF&CC issues recommendations to improve environment clearance and monitoring process

Expert committee meets to review projects in violation and grant environment clearance

Centre gives six months to deal with cases of environmental clearance violations

EIA notification amended to bring small-scale mining under its ambit

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.