Tribal groups raise concerns regarding delay in recognition of Community Forest Rights
Accusing the environment ministry of trying to deprive forest dwellers of their rights, Adivasi Janajati Adhikar Mancha (AJAM) said dilution of the “consent” clause of Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006 was “highly unconstitutional”. AJAM also said the environment ministry was “interfering and encroaching upon the affairs of MoTA (Ministry of Tribal Affairs) with the sole objective of denying and depriving the rights of adivasis forest dwellers”.
AJAM, a national level organisation of Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs), raised these issues in a letter to tribal affairs minister, Jual Oram, on March 19. AJAM wrote that it admired the stand taken by MoTA on growing attempts to dilute laws meant for protection of tribes and forest dwellers.
“AJAM is opposing any such move for dilution of the law in the strongest term and request the ministry to continue to protect such legislation and ensure that the rights of the adivasi forest dwellers are recognised and secured through effective implementation,” says the letter to Oram. “The government should proactively monitor for better and effective implementation of FRA in recognition of rights of forest dwellers. In no case, the power of gram sabha should be curtailed.”
The letter also draws attention to the delay in recognition of Community Forest Rights (CFR) in some states. AJAM highlights instances, in which CFR titles have been prepared without the involvement of gram sabhas and diverse procedures have been followed in different districts within a single state.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.